Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘To be equally familiar with the law and practical business needs provides maximum benefit for clients.’
Claudia Meindel

Claudia Meindel

  • Legal
  • Trademarks & Designs
  • Attorney-at-Law
  • Senior Associate

Claudia Meindel graduated in 1993 in the field of law at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich.

Parallel to her studies she worked as a certified paralegal at an IP law firm.

Continue reading

Claudia has a more than 25-years experience in industry, most of which has been in her capacity as Global Head of IP for one of the largest European multinational companies in the clothing industry with a brand presence in more than 120 markets worldwide.

She is specialized in the field of trademark and design, copyright, unfair competition, global textile labelling and related topics and contract types (license, franchise, R&D, agency, distribution; non-disclosure agreements).

Claudia has profound expertise in the following areas:

  • One-stop service for worldwide filings and global management of trademark and design portfolios; global IP network
  • Revamping global trademark and design portfolios to maintain their legal force and to achieve measurable  IP cost control
  • Bespoke ‘like an in-house’ IP services (specially for companies without own legal department and cushioning of peak workloads)
  • Support in setting up an in-house IP department/service
  • In-house IP trainings for employees

Grounded in her long-lasting experience in industry, she is familiar with the concerns and interests of the business from inside out and is speaking its language. She guarantees for tailored and practical legal solution, without loosing sight of the costs.

Working experience

  • Attorney-at-Law, Senior Associate, V.O. (starting February 2020)
  • Global Head of IP,  Triumph International Firm Group (2000 – January 2020)
  • Overseas Trademark Specialist, Triumph International AG (1993-1999)
  • Paralegal, IP law firm Dr. Hans-Peter Kunz-Hallstein (1986-1990)

Education

  • Graduation: First and Second Legal State Exam
  • Qualified Vocational Education as Paralegal

Publications

  • Book: Executive Summary – Überzeugende Entscheidungsvorlagen für das Management, Verlag C.H. Beck 2018
  • Co-author of Beck OK Designrecht, Editor Dr. Moritz Vohwinkel, 1st Edition 30.4.2019
  • GRUR Prax 2014, 97 Markenverteidigung im Zeitalter von Social Media; also published in Journal of IP Law and Practice JIPLAP – 2014-131
  • GRUR Prax 2015, 398 Mach Dir ein Bild: Tipps für die Auswahl und Analyse der Bildgestaltung
  • GRUR Prax 2016, 366 IP-Due Dilligence: Eine besondere Herausforderung für die kleine Rechtsabteilung

Professional & Community Activities

  • Member of Working Group German Trademark Association (Markenverband)
  • Member of the Board of Trustees of wip (Women in IP)
  • GRUR – German Association of IP and Editor’s Rights (1994-2019)
  • Federal Association of In-House Company Lawyers (2011-2019)
  • Regular Speaker and Co-Speaker Activities in IP:
    BVMW Bavarian Association of Medium-Sized Companies, FOM University for Working Students, Federal Patent Court Symposium, Technical University Ilmenau (PATON), Technical University Amberg-Weiden, INTA Paralegal Seminar, IP Service World, Women in IP

Languages

  • German
  • English

Also see these experts

Alissa Gondoin-van ‘t Klooster

Alissa Gondoin-van ‘t Klooster

  • European and Benelux Trademark and Design Attorney
  • Associate
Jorien Wartena

Jorien Wartena

  • Benelux Trademark and Design Attorney
  • Associate
More experts

News

UPC jurisdiction over UK designations and conditional infringement relief in Fujifilm v Kodak

In the case of Kodak vs. Fujifilm concerning EP 3 511 174 on 2 June 2026 before the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent, the Court of Appeal addressed the UPC’s jurisdiction over the UK designation of a European patent. The decision is important because it applies the CJEU’s reasoning in BSH v Electrolux […]Continue reading

Claim interpretation and the inescapable trap in T 0837/24

In T 0837/24 (8 December 2025), the Board considered how far a technically meaningful interpretation of a claim must be taken into account when assessing added subject-matter and extension of protection. The decision is notable for its treatment of claim construction after G 1/24, and for its finding that an inconsistent first-instance decision may amount […]Continue reading

Appeal against grant to restore pendency before the EPO Board of Appeal 

In T 0700/25, the Board considered whether an appeal by the patent proprietor against a decision to grant could be used to restore the pending status of a European patent application in order to file a divisional application. The decision is relevant for applicants who discover, after grant, that a divisional application should have been […]Continue reading