Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘Together, we can explore where IP fits into your business model best.’
Martijn Timmermans

Martijn Timmermans

  • Engineering
  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Senior Associate

Martijn Timmermans obtained both a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Eindhoven University of Technology. Within the broad field of mechanical engineering, he specialized in control and precision mechanics.

Continue reading

At the end of his bachelor’s, Martijn ran a project in computer vision for an eye-surgery robot, where 3D objects needed to be recognized inside the eye. During his master’s, Martijn spent a semester studying in Salerno, Italy. Here, he participated in a project  with a view to converting conventional cars into hybrid vehicles by means of solar panels and in-wheel motors. He completed the graduation project for his master’s at Prodrive Technologies in Son, where a conceptual machine was developed for the precise winding of coils.

In his capacity as European Patent Litigator, Martijn is allowed to act as UPC representative.

Working experience

  • Patent Attorney V.O. (Sep 2020)

Education

  • MSc in Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology (2017).

Languages

  • Dutch
  • English

Also see these experts

Mohammad Ahmadi Bidakhvidi

Mohammad Ahmadi Bidakhvidi

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Senior Associate
Gijs de Iongh

Gijs de Iongh

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Senior Associate
More experts

News

Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal regarding the applicability of G 1/24 claim interpretation to added-matter analysis (T 873/24)

In T 873/24 (Board of Appeal 3.3.05, oral proceedings 3 February 2026), the Board announced that it will refer questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) on whether (and how) the Enlarged Board’s claim-interpretation guidance in G 1/24 extends to the assessment of added subject-matter under Article 123(2) EPC and Article 76(1) EPC.Continue reading

Interpreting claim terms “holistically” after G 1/24: description-based definition applied in T 0439/22 (Board 3.2.01)

In T 0439/22 (Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.01, 11 December 2025) the Board applied the Enlarged Board’s guidance in G 1/24 on claim interpretation. The decision is a practical illustration of how an explicit definition in the description can determine the meaning of a seemingly straightforward term used in the claims. As this case shows, […]Continue reading

Omission of drawings from the granted patent: limits of “deemed approval” and appeal as a remedy (T 0550/25) 

In T 0550/25 (Technical Board of Appeal, 10 February 2026), the Board addressed a recurring procedural mishap: drawing sheets are missing from the text annexed to a Rule 71(3) EPC communication and the patent is granted without them. The decision is practically significant because it confirms that, in such circumstances, the applicant’s grant fee payment […]Continue reading