Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘My task is to optimize the process of building a company’s IP portfolio so that it can get the foothold it needs in the industry to secure its future.’
Philipp Reichl

Philipp Reichl

  • Hightech & Electronics
  • European and German Patent and Trademark Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Associate

Before starting his career in Intellectual Property in 2008 in a Munich IP Boutique, Philipp Reichl worked as a scientist in environmental and atmospheric physics at the University of Bremen. Philipp studied physics at the University of Bayreuth with an emphasis on biophysics, optics and spectroscopy.

Continue reading

Having worked for several years as the lead German patent attorney in electronics, electrical engineering and mechanical engineering for a large international patent law firm, Philipp has experience in a wide range of technical fields including areas such as automotive industry, industrial robots, healthcare and safety, and semiconductors. He has been working with local inventors on drafting patent applications as well as in the prosecution of German and European patent applications for international clients in particular from Asia and North America.

In his capacity as European Patent Litigator, Philipp is allowed to act as UPC representative.

Working experience

  • Patent Attorney, V.O. (2019 – present)
  • Pattent Attorney, Haseltine Lake LLP (2013 – 2019)
  • Patent engineer, Prinz & Partner (2008 – 2012)
  • Research scientist, University of Bremen (2006 – 2008)

Education

  • Law for Patent Attorneys, University of Hagen (2010 – 2012)
  • Dipl. Phys. Univ. Physik, University of Bayreuth (2000 – 2005)

Professional & Community Activities

  • GRUR
  • VPP
  • epi
  • FICPI

Languages

  • German
  • English
  • French

Also see these experts

Johannes van Melle

Johannes van Melle

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney
  • Partner
Jasper Groot Koerkamp

Jasper Groot Koerkamp

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner
More experts

News

Camera-based “display visibility” as a technical security measure in remote gaming: T 2030/22 (Board 3.4.03)

In T 2030/22 (Board of Appeal 3.4.03, 27 November 2025) the Board overturned a refusal for lack of inventive step and addressed, in the same context, an examining division’s concerns that a key feature had no technical effect or was insufficiently disclosed. The decision is of practical interest where image-based recognition is used to control […]Continue reading

Patents as tickets to tax benefits

Both in the Netherlands and Belgium, innovation deductions offer significant tax benefits for companies investing in R&D. The Dutch Innovation Box works through a reduced tax rate on profits from innovation, while Belgium uses the innovation deduction to fully exempt a percentage of these profits. It pays for innovative companies to explore these opportunities.Continue reading

Urgency and standing in UPC preliminary injunction proceedings: UPC_CFI_374/2025 (Local Division The Hague)

In its order in UPC_CFI_374/2025, Local Division The Hague, 29 August 2025 (Cilag/Ethicon v RiVOLUTiON), the Court dismissed an application for provisional measures primarily on lack of temporal urgency under Rule 211.4 Rules of Procedure (RoP). The order is a detailed illustration of how the UPC assesses “unreasonable delay” in preliminary injunction (PI) practice and […]Continue reading