Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘Optimally capitalize on your innovation. Activate your ideas. ’
Laurens van Breda

Laurens van Breda

  • Hightech & Electronics
  • Trainee Patent Attorney

Laurens van Breda obtained both his MSc in Applied Physics and his MSc in Business Administration from the University of Twente in 2023.

Continue reading

In his Business Administration studies, he specialized in financial management and wrote his thesis on blockchain in the banking sector.

In his Applied Physics studies, he specialized in optics and wrote his thesis on Interferometric Scattering Microscopy.

Laurens joined V.O. in 2023.

Education

  • MSc Business Administration, University of Twente (2023)
  • MSc Applied Physics, University of Twente (2023)
  • BSc Applied Physics, University of Twente (2020)

Languages

  • Dutch
  • English

 

Also see these experts

Jasper Groot Koerkamp

Jasper Groot Koerkamp

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner
Patrick Decrock

Patrick Decrock

  • European and Belgian Patent Attorney
  • Senior Associate
More experts

News

Camera-based “display visibility” as a technical security measure in remote gaming: T 2030/22 (Board 3.4.03)

In T 2030/22 (Board of Appeal 3.4.03, 27 November 2025) the Board overturned a refusal for lack of inventive step and addressed, in the same context, an examining division’s concerns that a key feature had no technical effect or was insufficiently disclosed. The decision is of practical interest where image-based recognition is used to control […]Continue reading

Patents as tickets to tax benefits

Both in the Netherlands and Belgium, innovation deductions offer significant tax benefits for companies investing in R&D. The Dutch Innovation Box works through a reduced tax rate on profits from innovation, while Belgium uses the innovation deduction to fully exempt a percentage of these profits. It pays for innovative companies to explore these opportunities.Continue reading

Urgency and standing in UPC preliminary injunction proceedings: UPC_CFI_374/2025 (Local Division The Hague)

In its order in UPC_CFI_374/2025, Local Division The Hague, 29 August 2025 (Cilag/Ethicon v RiVOLUTiON), the Court dismissed an application for provisional measures primarily on lack of temporal urgency under Rule 211.4 Rules of Procedure (RoP). The order is a detailed illustration of how the UPC assesses “unreasonable delay” in preliminary injunction (PI) practice and […]Continue reading