Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘A patent represents the optimal synergy between law and technology.’
Levi Verhage

Levi Verhage

  • Hightech & Electronics
  • Trainee Patent Attorney

Levi Verhage obtained both a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from Eindhoven University of Technology. He specialized in semiconductors, photonics and signal processing within the field of electrical engineering.

Continue reading

In 2023, he started as a trainee patent attorney at V.O. Patents & Trademarks.

 Working experience

  • Trainee patent attorney, V.O. (2023)

Education

  • MSc electrical engineering,  Eindhoven University of Technology (2021)

Publications

  • Verhage, L., van der Putten, J., van der Sommen, F., De Groof, J., Struyvenberg, M., & de With, P. H. N. (2020). The field effect in Barrett’s Esophagus: A macroscopic view using white light endoscopy and deep learning. In H. K. Hahn, & M. A. Mazurowski (editors), Medical Imaging 2020: Computer-Aided Diagnosis Article 1131437 (Proceedings of SPIE; Vol. 11314).

Languages

  • English
  • Dutch

Also see these experts

Hans Bottema

Hans Bottema

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner
Johannes van Melle

Johannes van Melle

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney
  • Partner
More experts

News

UPC anti-anti-suit injunctions as interim measures: Munich Local Division in Huawei v Netgear (UPC_CFI_791/2024)

In its Order of 11 December 2024 in UPC_CFI_791/2024 (Munich Local Division), the Unified Patent Court (UPC) granted an ex parte anti-anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction (AASI/AAEI) to prevent steps in US proceedings that were said to obstruct UPC patent enforcement. The decision is noteworthy for its articulation of the UPC’s jurisdictional basis and the procedural framework for […]Continue reading

R 0016/23: the Enlarged Board confirms the mandatory nature of oral proceedings upon request under Article 116(1) EPC 

In R 0016/23 (Enlarged Board of Appeal, 21 November 2025), the Enlarged Board set aside a Legal Board of Appeal decision which had dismissed an appeal without holding requested oral proceedings. The decision is a clear statement that efficiency and “timely legal certainty” cannot, in themselves, justify restricting the scope of Article 116(1) EPC when […]Continue reading

Medical-device infringement and “standard use”: LD Munich on lege artis use and conditional revocation counterclaims (UPC_CFI_628/2024) 

In its decision on the merits in UPC_CFI_628/2024 (with the related revocation counterclaim UPC_CFI_125/2025), the Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) addressed two practically relevant issues:Continue reading