Spring direct naar de hoofdnavigatie of de inhoud
‘The prospering of technical innovation goes beyond the conception of a great idea.’
Henri van Kalkeren

Henri van Kalkeren

  • Chemistry
  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner

Henri received a PhD degree in organic chemistry and carried out post-doctoral research position at the CPE in Lyon (France) before joining V.O. in 2014.

Continue reading

Henri’s daily practice mostly involves drafting and prosecution of patent applications for a broad variation of clients, ranging from start-ups, knowledge institutes, universities, SMEs and multinationals. He is also experienced in litigation before the Dutch patent courts and oral proceedings at the European and Dutch patent offices.

His technical expertise is generally in the field of chemistry and related fields, such as life sciences, material sciences, agriculture, pharmaceutical, medical devices and food sciences.

In his capacity as European Patent Litigator, Henri is allowed to act as UPC representative.

Working experience

  • Patent Attorney, V.O. (2014-present)
  • Post-doctoral researcher at École Supérieure de Chimie Physique Électronique (CPE) de Lyon (2013-2014)

Education

  • PhD in Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University Nijmegen (2013)
  • MSc in Organic Chemistry, Radboud University Nijmegen (2009)

Directories

  • Recognized as ‘Rising Star’ (2020 – 2025) and as ‘IP Star’ (2026) by Managing IP

Publications

  • D. W. P. M. Löwik, J. T. Meijer, I. J. Minten, H. A. van Kalkeren, L. Heckenmüller, I. Schulten, K. Sliepen, P. Smittenaar, J. C. M. van Hest, J. Pept. Sci. 2008, 14, 127-133
  • P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, T. Nuijens, J. G. de Vries, H. A. van Kalkeren, EP002107067A1, 2009
  • D. C. J. Waalboer, H. A. van Kalkeren, M. C. Schaapman, F. L. van Delft, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8878-8881
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, S. H. A. M. Leenders, C. R. A. Hommersom, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, F. L. van Delft, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11290-11295
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, J. J. Bruins, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, F. L. van Delft, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1417-1421
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, S. van Rootselaar, F. S. Haasjes, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, F. L. van Delft, Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 362, 30-37
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, F. L. van Delft, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, Pure Appl. Chem. 2013, 85, 817-828
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, A. L. Blom, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, M. A. J. Huijbregts, Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1255-1263
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, F. P. J. T. Rutjes, F. L. van Delft, ChemSusChem 2013, 9, 1615-1624
  • H. A. van Kalkeren, F. Haasjes, C. te Grotenhuis, C. A. Hommersom, F. P. J. T. Rutjes; F. L. van Delft, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 7059–7066

Languages

  • Dutch (native)
  • English (fluent)
  • French (basic)
  • German (basic

Also see these experts

Marco Molling

Marco Molling

  • European, Dutch and Belgian Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner
Huub Maas

Huub Maas

  • European and Dutch Patent Attorney, European Patent Litigator
  • Partner
More experts

News

UPC_CoA_622/2025: One word can have two different meanings within the same claim

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) Court of Appeal has confirmed and applied its earlier guidance that claim features must be interpreted in the light of the claim as a whole. In UPC_CoA_622/2025, Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump v Grundfos Holding, the Court also clarified that identical terms within a claim do not necessarily have to […]Continue reading

T 1186/24: claim wording determines the scope of sufficiency analysis

Claim interpretation can determine whether the invention is sufficiently disclosed In T 1186/24, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.08, 18 June 2026, the European Patent Office (EPO) considered how the wording of a claim affects the assessment of sufficiency of disclosure. The Board held that an expressly claimed alternative could not be read out of the […]Continue reading

The license of right for the unitary patent: smart cost saving or strategic limitation?

With the introduction of the European patent with unitary effect (unitary patent or UP), patent holders now have access to new strategic tools. One of these is the license of right (LoR). What does such a declaration entail, and what advantages and disadvantages can it have for the protection of your intellectual property?Continue reading

Events

FICPI 23rd Open Forum

Budapest, Corinthia Budapest, Erzsébet körút, Hungary

The FICPI 23rd Open Forum provides excellent opportunities to build strong relationships by connecting groups of people who share common goals, concerns and a commitment to quality, as well as opportunities to gather insights from the international IP attorney community on IP practice-related issues or topics of IP law and hear from top-quality speakers.

Continue reading

Med-Tech Innovation & Licensing Day

High Tech Campus Eindhoven, High Tech Campus, Eindhoven

Collaborating to Commercialize Healthcare Innovation: From Research to Patient Impact

Continue reading